Trans-Australia Airlines Museum

subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link
subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link
subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link
subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link
subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link
subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link
subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link
subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link

Australia's Aviation - Two Airline Policy

Continues

TAA was seen to have an unfair advantage and the Liberal government's benevolent attitude to ANA was emphasized in 1955 when it legislated to maintain control by directing TAA to exchange 3 turbo-prop Viscount aircraft with ANA, for 2 slower and older, piston-engine Douglas DC6Bs, and then direct TAA to buy a third DC6B to maintain seat parity, and equipment similarities.

Irrespective of TAA's objections to this decision, TAA was bound by its obligation to conform as the government held the 'purse strings', and was also the dictator of the industry.

In 1955, under these constraints, TAA introduced 'Tourist Class' today "Economy" class, in an endeavor to promote air travel and attract additional passengers. Needless to say this benefited the whole industry where it was introduced.

This policy would be in vogue for over twenty years, constantly being amended, and it was the inhibitor for the introduction of pure jet aircraft to his country, as TAA had in 1956 assessed and then placed orders for the French Caravelle twin jet (TAA had also assessed the British Trident twin jet, and aircraft from the USA), an aircraft considered the most acceptable to Australian conditions.

Because of the legislation, TAA had to cancel this contract and abide by the agreement introducing slower and older technology in the form of the Lockheed Electra Mk2, an 84 seat turboprop aircraft until its competitor was financially able to support the introduction of pure jet aircraft, in 1964.

Changing Names Changing Conditions and the solution to maintaining the Two Airline Policy

With the death of Ivan Holyman in 1957, the original founder of Holyman Airways, and current General Manager of ANA, the government reassessed air travel, subsidies and general performance of each airline, as ANA continued to receive subsidies and TAA was returning a profit, whilst the owners of ANA were unwilling to inject additional funds to maintain the established controlled competition.

The government suggested to ANSETT Airways of Hamilton in Victoria - Reginald Miles ANSETT was General Manger and owner, (Ansett Airways held some 15% of the domestic network as a minor operator and was the most likely alternative to maintain a competitive environment) - that he might make a takeover bid for ANA. His initial bid of £3,000,000 (pounds) was rejected and so with assistance from the government and the Shell Oil Company (a further £300,000) he made a second and final bid, which was begrudgingly accepted by the shipping companies and ANSETT-ANA became the second airline.

Ansett, now with a large debt, could not afford to introduce pure jet aircraft in 1959, and convinced the government that if he was to compete as per the two airlines agreement , ANSETT-ANA could introduce the cheaper, but larger aircraft, the Lockheed Electra Mk2. The government agreed and TAA was forced to cancel the Caravelle order and reorder Lockheed aircraft.


VH-TLA Lockheed Electra Mk2 - John Eyre

And so began decades of 'regulated' airservices, fare control, illusionary competition, and constrained development, all to the detriment of the local industry.

This policy effectively dictated the terms for both airlines, rigidly policed and scrutinized, and any change required government approval; a far cry from the original charter under which TAA was established to pioneer and provide complete air services to the people of Australia.

The strangest fact that this control was admired by many countries where operators would come and go, economies of operation would dictate minimum standards of service or equipment servicing or replacement of aircraft and a stabile fare structure and passenger service expectation an area where Australia lead the rest of the world.

Two Airline Policy continues

 

About Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2008 - 2009 TAA Museum /25 Year Club