Trans-Australia Airlines Museum

subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link | subglobal1 link
subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link | subglobal2 link
subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link | subglobal3 link
subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link | subglobal4 link
subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link | subglobal5 link
subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link | subglobal6 link
subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link
subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link | subglobal8 link

The Open Skies Airline Policy


 

 

 

The Open Skies Policy and Deregulation

Airline deregulation provided benefits to the average traveler as airline services were historically heavily regulated, in part because of concerns about the government monopoly and oligopoly arising from the fact that in most cases, when only two airlines provided direct flights between a given "city pair", services had been totally regulated.

Open Skies policy - part of deregulation.

Open Skies agreements between the US and Australia (and other countries) opened the aviation market to foreign access and removed barriers to competition, giving airlines equal rights to operate air services from any point to any point in the other country, as well as to and from third countries.

Initially this applied to international airlines and operations to and from Australia, but in 1990, Compass applied for, and received permission to enter the market, and was Australia's first low cost airline.

Previously the two airline policy was a legal barrier to new entrants to the Australian aviation market, but this no longer applied, and hence, Compass Mk I, as it later became known, was established by Bryan Grey, who had previously been General Manager of a regional airline - East-West Airlines, located in country New South Wales, servicing Sydney and regional centres within the state.

East-West Airlines had earlier attempted to break the duopoly of Ansett and Australian Airlines (originally TAA) by offering cheap fares, but in the regulated environment of the time, it was not allowed to operate directly between major cities, so EWA was forced to detour via regional centres.

East-West was ultimately taken over by Ansett.

Deregulation and Compass

At its peak Compass Mark I operated four leased Airbus A300 Aircraft, and as result of the difficulty in obtaining airport terminal space and the failure of finance negotiations, Compass (Mk 1) floundered and failed. Compass Mk I collapsed little more than a year after its first flight, with the superficial reasons being portrayed as undercapitalisation and sustained fare discounting by the now three competitors.

There was clearly more to the collapse than undercapitalisation, as the Federal Government had made it near impossible for the new airline to succeed, evidenced by the lack of suitable facilities provided to Compass in the major cities, and the fledgling carrier was forced to accept what were the least accessible aircraft parking bays in the TAA terminals, an impediment to it being successful, and also noted by the governments' own subsequent ACCC study.

Compass Airlines initial operations were also significantly disrupted by a computer attack on their reservations system, by an unknown source.

Although this terminal location dispute had been ongoing, the Government chose to act just before the 1991 Christmas traveling period, and at 9pm on December 20th 1991, Compass 1 was grounded. Such were the complexities of this case that the matter remained unresolved until a final High Court of Australia hearing in 1999. It was obvious that the government, who controlled the industry, had orchestrated the entire scenario to the demise of the airline.

Certainly the airline, if allowed to continue trading over the Christmas period, would have been able to refute its disputed financial obligations, as it was heavily booked.

In addition Compass were penalised due to alleged non-payment of airways expenses and the Civil Aviation Authority shut down Compass 5 days before the immensely profitable Christmas travel period, and the disposal of Compass aircraft by government instruction saw them expeditiously flown out of the country.

It appeared that it would again be 'a controlled environment as Ansett and TAA/Australian were the sole remaining players. This was in effect, a 'de-facto' two-airline policy, with the government controlling aviation develpment again.

 

   
About Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | ©2008 - 2009 TAA Museum /25 Year Club